The first post in this blog series spoke of the trend of
many governments to put a “squeeze” on struggling economies instead of pumping
liquidity and giving them a chance to strive towards recovery.
Before moving on and looking at various governments measures
in relation to liquidity, I will briefly look at the elements up for discussion
here.
Firstly, the idea of liquidity, relates to the ability and the ease at which an asset
can be converted into cash. A previous economics and intrinsic valuations
lecturer of mine, Tom Power (DIT), drilled the notion that “Cash is King” into
my head throughout my undergraduate degree. And now looking at the global
economy over the last 5 years and the lack of cash circulating, I can clearly
see his viewpoint.
This lack of
liquidity, brings us on to explain austerity. Austerity measures are usually
taken by governments when they fail in their abilities to honour debt
liabilities. This widely topical process can involve a various range of
measures to cut budget deficits, including, tax increases, reduction in social
welfare payments, reduced spending etc. The overall aims of these measures are clearly
visible and understandable in most cases; the problems arise with their
associated negative externalities.
This week saw the
Greek parliament approved a set of austerity
measures to avoid a disastrous default and secure a second bailout from the EU
and IMF. In my next post I will consider
some of the negative externalities associated with this bill that sets out
to make cuts of €3.3bn in wages, pensions and job cuts for 2012 alone.
No comments:
Post a Comment